UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has been reprimanded by Parliament's standards guardian for not disclosing his wife's financial interest in a childcare company that could have benefited from government policies. The standards commissioner, Daniel Greenberg, acknowledged that Sunak breached the code of conduct for government ministers but deemed the error "inadvertent" and opted not to impose sanctions.
An investigation was initiated in April regarding Sunak's failure to disclose his wife, Akshata Murthy's, shareholding in Koru Kids. The company was set to receive government support for childcare services. Greenberg clarified that Murthy's shareholding should have been declared as a relevant interest, but he attributed the lapse to confusion about regulations rather than deliberate deception.
ALSO READ: Russian plane crash: Wagner leader Yevgeny Prigozhin among victims, Investigation underway
In response to the findings, Sunak expressed his apology for the oversight. Greenberg concluded that the matter is now closed, signifying the end of the investigation. This incident is part of a larger trend of ethical breaches involving members of the UK's Conservative government. Former Prime Minister Boris Johnson faced a series of scandals that led to his resignation in 2022. His tenure was marred by controversies related to judgment and financial matters.
Rishi Sunak assumed office with the promise to restore order and integrity to the government after a period of turbulence under Boris Johnson and his brief successor, Liz Truss. Sunak, a former investment banker, has faced scrutiny regarding his own wealth and his wife's financial arrangements. Akshata Murthy, the daughter of an Indian billionaire, previously made headlines for not paying UK tax on overseas income, including substantial dividends from Infosys, her father's IT company.
While Rishi Sunak's failure to declare his wife's financial interest is deemed inadvertent, it underscores the need for transparency and adherence to ethical standards within the government. This incident contributes to a broader conversation about accountability and integrity among political leaders in the UK.