Celebs skeptical as BNS 318/319 replaces IPC 420
BNS

Celebs skeptical as BNS 318/319 replaces IPC 420

BNS 318/319 replaces IPC 420, but celebrities doubt it will fade away

Recently, Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), known for its association with cheating and fraud, has been replaced by Sections 318 and 319 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). This change has sparked discussions, especially in pop culture and social media, where references to "420" were common.

Legal and cultural shift

Historically, Section 420 of the IPC, introduced during British rule in 1860, became widely recognized through Bollywood movies and everyday language, often used to describe deceitful acts. Movies like "Shree 420" and "Chachi 420" further embedded the term in popular imagination.

Following the replacement, social media has been abuzz with debates on whether phrases like "420 ho gaya" will retain their cultural impact. Legal experts and influencers have noted the significance of this change, highlighting that BNS 318 now addresses offenses related to cheating and deceit with provisions for up to seven years of imprisonment or fines.

ALSO READ: Suhana Khan spotted partying with rumored Boyfriend Agastya Nanda in London

Celebrities have chimed in, with varying opinions on the lasting influence of "420" in vernacular culture. Some feel that despite the legal update, references to "420" will endure due to its entrenched presence in public consciousness and popular media.

Looking ahead

As discussions continue, it remains to be seen how the transition from IPC 420 to BNS 318/319 will affect everyday language and cultural references. The debate reflects broader societal attitudes towards legal terminology and its integration into colloquial speech.

The replacement underscores ongoing shifts in legal frameworks and their implications for societal norms and language usage, highlighting the evolving nature of legal discourse in contemporary India.

ALSO READ: Jatt & Juliet 3 takes the World by storm, shattering Box Office records


Comment As:

Comment (0)