Hong Kong's landmark ruling on LGBTQ rights

A landmark ruling on Same-sex couples

Hong Kong's highest court delivered a significant ruling on Tuesday, marking a partial victory for the LGBTQ community. While it stopped short of granting full marriage rights to same-sex couples, the Court of Final Appeal ruled in favor of recognizing same-sex partnerships, including civil unions. This historic decision came in response to a case brought by Jimmy Sham, a pro-democracy activist currently incarcerated.

Progress amid challenges

Over the past decade, LGBTQ activists in Hong Kong have achieved incremental successes in court, challenging discriminatory government policies related to visas, taxes, and housing benefits. However, this case marked the first time the Court of Final Appeal directly addressed the issue of same-sex marriage. In its ruling, the court stated that the Hong Kong government had failed in its obligation to establish an alternative framework for the legal recognition of same-sex couples, such as civil unions. Nevertheless, the court did not go as far as granting full marriage equality for same-sex couples.

ALSO READ: Biden's Labor Day speech and 2024 election focus

Shifting public opinion

In semi-autonomous Hong Kong, there has been a notable shift in public opinion towards greater support for same-sex marriage. A recent poll indicated that 60 percent of Hong Kongers now support same-sex marriage, a substantial increase from just 38 percent a decade ago. Jimmy Sham's legal challenge, however, faced hurdles as he sought recognition of his same-sex marriage, which was registered in New York almost ten years ago. The constitutional text in Hong Kong, according to appeal judges in August 2022, restricts marriage access to heterosexual couples.

Sham argued that the city's ban on same-sex marriage not only violated his right to equality but also infringed upon his right to privacy. His legal representation, British rights lawyer Karon Monaghan, highlighted the disadvantages faced by same-sex couples in areas like inheritance and housing rentals due to the ban.

ALSO READ: Joint Philippine-US naval exercise in South China Sea

Despite this legal milestone, Hong Kong still lacks comprehensive anti-discrimination protections based on sexual orientation and gender identity. While local courts have progressively struck down discriminatory policies, they have done so on a case-by-case basis, making progress slow. This case sought broader recognition of same-sex marriage, making success more challenging.

In Asia, only Nepal and Taiwan have recognized same-sex marriage, while South Korea is considering legislation to recognize same-sex partnerships. Some international businesses in Hong Kong have supported marriage equality campaigns to attract talent. However, the city's leadership, approved by Beijing, has shown limited interest in advancing LGBTQ equality through legislation. In the wake of Beijing's imposition of a national security law in 2020 and the subsequent suppression of pro-democracy activism, rights advocacy, including LGBTQ rights, has faced challenges and restrictions in Hong Kong.